Legislation

The Mandatory Fluoridation Bill

Legislation was introduced to Parliament on the 17th November 2016 to remove control and decision making from local councils to a centralised entity and passed into law on the 16th November 2021

On the 27th of July 2022 Ashley Bloomfield in his last week as Director General of Health, sent a letter to 14 councils directing them to start fluoridation. The Directives sent to each council explain what steps the Director General took to come to his decision. The information provided is scant as it does not give a breakdown of the actual number of fillings he believes would be saved. His beliefs rely on outdated information. Even the Cochrane Review of 2015 says the only research it could find on the supposed benefit of fluoridation where all prior to 1975 and may not be relevant today.

The Director General was not required to take into consideration any potential harmful effects.

The Councils were:

Auckland, Hastings, Horowhenua, Kawerau, Nelson, New Plymouth, Rotorua Lakes, Tararua, Tauranga City, Waipa, Waitaki, Western Bay of Plenty, Far North and Whangārei councils will have between six months and over three years, depending on the circumstances, to fluoridate parts of their water supply that were not already fluoridated.

In Auckland, to fluoridate Onehunga. Waipa to fluoridate Cambridge. Far North to fluoridate Kerikeri and Kaitaia.

Directives sent to the councils:

Press Release 21st June 2022 Government dictates to communities again

Background

On the 15th of November the Mandatory Fluoridation Bill was passed into law.

See Part 5A Fluoridation of Drinking Water of the Heath Act 1956

This Bill was originally introduced by the National Government to shift decision making from the local councils to the District Health Boards. The Bill was designed to remove input from the local communities and ensure fluoridation is introduced in all areas of New Zealand.

In 2020 the Labour Government introduced a Supplementary Order paper to shift decision making solely to the Director General of Health. This was in response to the Labour Government disbanding the District Health Boards in favour of centralised control.

Before ordering councils to introduce fluoridation, the Director General must:

seek and consider advice from the Director of Public Health
consider all scientific evidence on the effectiveness of fluoridation to reduce dental decay
determine whether any benefits outweigh the financial costs, taking into account the likely state of oral health in your community and the number of people likely to receive water from the local authority.
The ongoing cost of fluoridation

See original Bill Health Fluoridation of Drinking Water Amendment Bill

Why we are opposed:

This Legislation shifts responsibility from the local councils to the Director General of Health. It is designed to make it virtually impossible to stop fluoridation in currently fluoridated areas, or to keep it out of places that do not have it – even if that community has said “no” to it in the past. Local Councils will be required to do as the DHB dictates or face a fine of $200,000 and a further $10,000 per day of non-compliance.

This Legislation does not allow for the local councils to consult with the community

What the Politicians said:

At First Reading, Annette King, who was then Labour’s spokesperson on Health had this to say:

“The Minister said that population health is best addressed by elected district health boards at a local level. They are required by the Minister of Health, who has absolute say over what they do through the letter of expectation, to carry out the wishes of the Government of the day. So the idea that they have got some autonomy in making decisions around health is only very, very at the edges, if at all.”

As you will see from the transcript and related documents and the video footage of the MPs that spoke at the first Reading (5th of December 2016) – National, Labour and the Greens support the Bill. You will also see that none of the speakers know very much about the subject. Health Select Committee Chair Simon O’Connor mistakenly credits his good teeth on taking fluoride tablets as a child. Unbeknownst to him, the Ministry of Health no longer recommends fluoride tablets because we now know fluoride doesn’t work by swallowing and fluoride tablets cause dental fluorosis!

In a press release in December 2016, Labour also condemned the Maori Party for running a poll to find out what people think.

Select Committee

In February 2017 , the Health Select Committee received 1200 submissions and heard hundreds of people give oral presentations.

Click here to see submissions from Fluoride Free NZ and others

The Committee reported back to Parliament with a few recommendations. Since the election, the Health Select Committee has completely changed so none of the MPs that heard the submissions are on the Committee now.

Download Select Committee Report (contains recommendations for amendments)

Where the Parties stood

Associate Health Minister Peter Dunne, who introduced the Bill, has called people who are opposed to fluoridation as “tin-foil hat wearing, UFO-abducted pseudo-scientists.” He mustn’t have realised that he was insulting around half of the NZ population. Results from all referenda held in NZ show that people tend to vote status quo. As only half of the country is fluoridated (23 councils out of 67, not “27 councils have rejected fluoridation” as Peter Dunne incorrectly stated) which means that roughly half the population is opposed to fluoridation (or maybe more than half) and if a nationwide referendum was held tomorrow, we would have a good chance of winning.

Peter Dunne, was voted out of Parliament in 2017

Labour: Pro-fluoridation and in favour of mandatory fluoridation

National: Pro-fluoridation and in favour of mandatory fluoridation

NZ First: should be decided by local referendum.

The Greens supported the Bill regardless of the opposition within the party. They refused to meet with anyone opposed.

Health Select Committee Members in 2018
Louisa Wall – Chairperson, Labour Party, Manurewa
Shane Reti – Deputy Chair, National Party, Whangarei
Jonathan Coleman – National Party, Northcote, ex-Health Minister who introduced the Bill
Matt Doocey – National Party, Christchurch
Liz Craig – Invercargill ,Labour Party , public health doctor
Kanongata’a Suisuiki Anahila – Labour, Senior exec Min Soc Development
Nicky Wagner – National Party, Christchurch
Angie Warren-Clark – Tauranga, Labour Party, lawyer, manager Women’s Refuge Tauranga

Health Select Committee Members in 2017 when Submissions were heard
Simon O’Connor, Chairperson, National Party, Tāmaki
Barbara Kuriger, Deputy-Chairperson, National Party, Taranaki-King Country
Melissa Lee, Member, National Party, Waitaki
Julie Anne Genter, Member, Green Party, List
David Clark, Member, Labour Party, Dunedin North
Sarah Dowie, Member, National Party, Invercargill
Scott Simpson, Member, National Party, Coromandel
Ria Bond, Member, NZ First, List
Poto Williams, Member, Labour Party, Christchurch East

In the Media

Whangarei District Council Whangārei Mayor says her council will not fluoridate unless government pays

Waipa District Council – Debate over fluoride flares

31st March 2021 “Highly Wrong” Judith Collins hits back at report she lost caucus vote on fluoride

18th March 2021 National concerned with government move to centralise drinking water fluoridation power

18th March 2021 Water Fluoridation to be controlled by Director General of Health under proposed law

18th March 2021 Water fluoridation powers to be taken off councils, giving control to Ashley Bloomfield

16th March 2021 Water fluoridation move a significant “shift in thinking” says Marlborough mayor

25th February 2021 Whangarei’s mayor against DHBs making fluoride decisions

August 2017 Coleman and Dunne a disgrace to health portfolios

13th July 2017 Artificial fluoridation is a fraud _ NZ Health Minister doges question

7th June 2017 Fluoridation: the greatest good for the greatest number

6th June 2017 Government commits $12m to help councils cover costs of fluoridation in water supplies

15th March 2017 Councils push for Health Ministry to take over national powers on water fluoridation

17th November 2016 Press Release Jonathan Coleman and Peter Dunne

13th April 2016 Bill reopens fluoridation debate

13th April 2016 Health Minister Coleman says DHBs “more motivated” than councils to fluoridate

12th April 2016 DHBs could make call on fluoridation

More Information

Local Government New Zealand’s response to amendments to the Act
Ministry of Health’s position statement on current proposed Legislation
Legislative Disclosure Statement from the Ministry of Health.
Regulatory Impact Statement – Transferring decision making
MoH Report Summarising Submissions to the Select Committee
Hon Dr Jonathan Coleman (Minister of Health) Fluoride in drinking water: Urgent amendment to Medicines Regulations 1984 proposed. (20 Nov 2014)
Medicines Amendment Regulations 2015 (27 Jan 2015)
New Health New Zealand Inc v Attorney General (Oct 2014)
The question of legality (Updated as at May 2012)
National Ethics Advisory Committee – why won’t they address fluoridation? (2006)
Fluoridation decision-making in NZ contains a thorough analysis of the issue of human rights (2002)
The Human Rights Commission ruling (1980)
The Lewis (Privy Council) case (1965)

After doing a lot of research due to feeling ill and wanting to live a cleaner lifestyle. I was disgusted to learn fluoride which has been promoted for heathly teeth is a well known toxin. And this toxin is been put in our water.

It doesn’t matter if the dose in our water is low. It is a poison!
No level of poison is safe. So while I can buy a distiller to help minimize the effects of fluoride i’m drinking ( and yes i feel better, since doing this)

We are not just putting this poison in our mouths, and in our childrens mouths. We are drinking it, we are bathing in it, we wash our food in it and we don’t have a choice, this is appauling.

It’s known to damage the thyroid. It’s known to damage bones.
Its known to cause stomach problems. It’s known to increase the risk of cancer.
Floride is a key componant in rat poison and some insecticides.

This needs to stop. If individuals want flouride for their teeth, it can be their choice. But don’t poison the rest of NZ with this toxic chemical.

If trends are anything to go by, you will notice an influx in kiwis looking for more natural products including a fluoride free toothpaste. So why would we want this in our water which we use for so much. Please stop poisoning us.

Claire Newell, Auckland